Programmatically place comments
You use an autograder, and want to place comments on student work showing what code failed tests.
codePost makes it easy to manually annotate student code. If you also run autograding scripts to test student code for correctness, you might want to programmatically annotate student code to show which code passed correctness tests, and which code failed. That would save all the effort of manually reading through autograder output and placing comments in student code by hand.
Let's learn how to programmatically place comments on student code by parsing autograder output.
You can find all of the code used in this tutorial here.
1. The goal
Let's say our students submitted one homework file called homework.py
. Don't worry, we'll talk about how to extend this tutorial to other languages and multiple files at the end.
homework.py
contains a bunch of methods. Our autograder script tests each of these methods by calling them with various inputs, and comparing the student code's output with expected output. Our autograder logs its output in a .txt
called tests.txt
.
Autograder Summary
-- Test 1 --
Function: find_max
Input: [-1, -2]
Expected output: -1
Actual output: 0
Result: Fail
-- Test 2 --
Function: reverse
Input: [1,2,3,4]
Expected output: [4,3,2,1]
Actual output: [4,2,3,1]
Result: Fail
...
Alongside the definition of each function written by the student, we want to place a codePost comment that shows the output of the autograder tests corresponding to that function. We'll end up with a submission that looks like this.
We're going to assume that we've already uploaded student submissions to codePost (if you need help uploading, check out this tutorial).
We need to do two things:
(1) parse the output of tests.txt
(2) place comments in homework.py
.
We'll start with #2, which will show us exactly what we need to accomplish in #1.
2. Placing comments using the codePost API
Since we're going to place comments on each student's submission, we need to loop through all of the submissions corresponding to this assignment. Here's how we can do that with the codePost API.
#!/usr/local/bin/python3
import codepost
codepost.configure_api_key(api_key="YOUR API KEY")
# retrieve your course
this_course = codepost.course.list_available(name="NAME", period="PERIOD")[0]
# retrieve the assignment
this_assignment = this_course.assignments.by_name(name="ASSIGNMENT_NAME")
# retrieve a list of submissions
submissions = this_assignment.list_submissions()
# loop over submissions
for submission in submissions:
...
Now, we can fill in the body of the loop. Inside the loop, we need to do the following.
(a) Get the contents of tests.txt
and homework.py
(b) Use the contents of tests.txt
to figure out which tests correspond to which functions
(c) Figure out where each function is defined in homework.py
, so we can place comments precisely
(d) Place a comment on each function definition that has at least one test
Let's start with (a). This is easy. We can access the submission's files and then search by name using the codePost API's handy by_name
function.
# get the files we're interested in
test_file = submission.files.by_name(name="tests.txt")
student_code = submission.files.by_name(name="homework.py")
Next, (b). To parse the contents of tests.txt
, we'll write a function. We'll do this in the next section. For now, assume the existence of a function called parse_test_output
that returns a dictionary where each key
is function name and each value
is a string corresponding to the test output.
Finally, (c). We'll write a function called find_function_definition
in the next section to do this. We'll pass this function a function name and the student's code, and we'll get back an object that specifies where the function is defined in the student's code.
Armed with these two functions, we can move on to (d). To place a codePost comment, we need to know the following properties:
- file:
homework.py
- text: we'll concatenate the results of any tests corresponding to the function
- pointDelta: we'll use
0
, but you could choose to take points off for failed tests - rubricComment: we'll set this field to
None
, but you could use rubric comments to better track which tests students are failing - startChar, endChar, startLine, endLine: provided to us by
find_function_definition
We're ready to go!
# get the files we're interested in
test_file = submission.files.by_name(name="tests.txt")
student_code = submission.files.by_name(name="homework.py")
# parse test output
tests_by_function = parse_test_output(test_file._data['code'])
# loop over functions which have at least one test
for function_name in tests_by_function.keys():
# parse student code to figure out where to place comment
where_to_place = fund_function_definition(function_name, student_code.code)
# define comment using codePost comment schema
comment = {
'file': student_code._get_id()
'text': ("\n").join(tests_by_function[function_name]),
'pointDelta': 0,
'rubricComment': None,
'startChar': where_to_place['startChar'],
'endChar': where_to_place['endChar'],
'startLine': where_to_place['startLine'],
'endLine': where_to_place['endLine'],
}
codepost.comment.create(**comment)
There's one problem here. codePost renders comment text using Markdown. That means we have to escape any brackets if we want them to show up properly in codePost comments.
# join all tests corresponding to the funciton called function_name
test_text = (" \n").join(tests_by_function[function_name])
# escape brackets for Markdown
test_text_escaped = test_text.replace('[', '`[').replace(']', ']`')
# define comment using codePost comment schem
comment = {
'text': test_text_escaped,
'file': student_code.id,
'pointDelta': 0,
'rubricComment': None,
**where_to_place, # save space by deconstructing where_to_place
}
We should add some error handling here, but other than that, all we have left to do is define parse_test_output
and find_function_definition
!
Let's do that now.
3. Write helper functions
First, let's write parse_test_output
. To do this, we need to loop over the contents of tests.txt
, and do the following:
- If we find the start of a test, capture all 6 lines of it. We can assume all tests (and tests only) contain a string that looks like
Test \d
. - Figure out the function the test corresponds to (indicated in the second line of test output)
- Add the test to the function's test list
The following code achieves that.
import re
def parse_test_output(text):
# indicates start of test output
regexp = re.compile(r'Test \d')
LINES_IN_TEST = 6
# gather together all test output objects
tests = {}
linesSearched = 0
lines_of_output = text.split('\n')
while linesSearched < len(lines_of_output):
line = lines_of_output[linesSearched]
# does this line correspond to the start of a test?
if regexp.search(line):
# Capture the contents of this test
test = " \n".join(lines_of_output[linesSearched:linesSearched+LINES_IN_TEST])
# what function does this test correspond to?
# function specified on line 1 of the test output
functionName = re.sub(r'Function: ', '', lines_of_output[linesSearched+1])
# store in value array with function name as key
if functionName in tests:
tests[functionName].append(test)
else:
tests[functionName] = [test]
# we just captured the whole test
linesSearched += LINES_IN_TEST
else:
# continue scanning
linesSearched += 1
return tests
Writing find_function_definition
is even easier. All we need to do there is:
- search the student's code for the input function's definition
- if we find it, report the line and characters where the definition exists in the code string
def find_function_definition(function_name, code):
lines = code.split('\n')
# this corresponds to a Python function definition. See below for other langs
stringToFind = 'def %s' % (function_name)
for index, line in enumerate(lines):
startChar = line.find(stringToFind)
# if we found the string corresponding to the right function definition
if startChar > -1:
return {
'startChar': startChar,
'endChar' : startChar + len(stringToFind),
'startLine': index,
'endLine': index,
}
# couldn't find the function definition
return None
4. Run it!
That's all there is to it! We can now run our script, and watch as the codePost API places comments for us. Here's the full code (excluding the helper functions, which are tucked away in a file called helpers.py
)
#!/usr/local/bin/python3
# Imports
import codepost
from helpers import parse_test_output, find_function_definition
# Set some required variables
course_name = '<COURSE NAME>'
course_period = '<COURSE PERIOD>'
assignment_name = '<ASSIGNMENT NAME>'
test_output_file = 'tests.txt'
student_code_file = 'homework.py'
codepost.configure_api_key(api_key='<YOUR API KEY>')
###################################################################################################
# try to find course
course_list = codepost.course.list_available(name=course_name, period=course_period)
this_course = course_list[0]
this_assignment = this_course.assignments.by_name(name=assignment_name)
# retrieve list of assignment's submissions
submissions = this_assignment.list_submissions()
# loop through submissions
for submission in submissions:
# get files corresponding to this submission
test_file = submission.files.by_name(name=test_output_file)
student_code = submission.files.by_name(name=student_code_file)
if (test_file is not None) and (student_code is not None):
# the 'code' of the test output file is the test output
tests_by_function = parse_test_output(test_file.code)
# loop over the functions which were tested at least once
for function_name in tests_by_function.keys():
# use helper function to figure out where the function corresponding to function_name
# was defined
where_to_place = find_function_definition(function_name, student_code.code)
if where_to_place is not None:
test_text = (" \n").join(tests_by_function[function_name])
test_text_escaped = test_text.replace('[', '`[').replace(']', ']`')
# construct codePost comment
comment = {
'text': test_text_escaped,
'file': student_code.id,
'pointDelta': 0,
'rubricComment': None,
**where_to_place,
}
# post the comment to codePost
codepost.comment.create(**comment)
There are plenty of cool ways to extend this script. Here are some ideas:
- Automatically deduct points based on the tests a student fails. You can do this by dynamically setting the
pointDelta
of a comment - Only show the full output of tests which a student fails
- Use rubric comments to track which tests students are failing. To do this, you can create a rubric comment corresponding to each test. Then, you can place one comment per failed test (instead of concatenating tests into one comment per function as we did here). In those comments, set the
rubricComment
field so your comment applies the appropriate rubric comment. Then you'll get all the benefits of using a rubric, including tracking and the ability to batch alter point values after comments have been applied.
A. Extensions
Different language
If your student code is written in a language other than Python, all you need to do is tell parse_test_output
what to look for in a function definition. In the version we wrote, this would require replacing stringToFind = 'def %s' % (function_name)
with a string specifying how functions are defined in the language of your assignment. You could also use a regular expression to capture more complicated function definitions (e.g. those in statically typed languages, like Java).
Multiple files
If your students' submission involve more than one code file, you'll need to locate the right file, as well as the right location within that file, to place a test summary comment. The following loop body would work
# loop over submissions
for submission in submissions:
# get test output
test_file = submission.files.by_name(name=test_output_file)
# parse test output
tests_by_function = parse_test_output(test_file.code)
# loop over functions which have at least one test
for function_name in tests_by_function.keys():
# parse student code files
for file in submission.files:
where_to_place = find_function_definition(function_name, file.code)
if where_to_place is not None:
# define comment using codePost comment schema
comment = {
'file': file.id
'text': ("\n\n").join(tests_by_function[function_name]),
'pointDelta': 0,
'rubricComment': None,
**where_to_place
}
codepost.comment.create(**comment)
continue
Updated over 5 years ago